Sara Saito vs Charo Esquiva Banuls Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Saito vs Banuls analysis and find out who is favored!
Sara Saito vs Charo Esquiva Banuls Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Saito 0 - 0 Banuls
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Saito has won 50.4% of points on their second serve, while Banuls has won 40.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Saito, in recent form, has won 55.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Banuls has won 57.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.42% and 48.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Saito has saved 53.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Banuls has saved 47.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Saito has won 64.91% of matches played (W/L 37/ 20), with Banuls winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Saito has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Banuls has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Saito has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 34/ 18), where as Banuls has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Saito has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.89 while Banuls has played against players with an average rank of 190.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Saito has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Banuls has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Saito has converted 50.34% of breakpoint opportunities, and Banuls has converted 56.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
1
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
249
Rank
236
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
846
Rank
846
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
66% (59-31)
Career Total W/L
60% (6-4)
67% (22-11)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$5,590
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sara Saito | Charo Esquiva Banuls |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 67% (22/11) | 60% (3/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (49/28) | 60% (6/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (388/308) | 54% (45/39) |
Hard Win/Loss | 69% (20/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 60% (3/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 44 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.48 |
DFs Total | 63 | 20 |
Avg Match Time | 1:34:14 | 1:23:12 |
Avg Opp Rank | 288.7 | 75.2 |
1st Serve % | 70% (1479/2106) | 50% (132/263) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (919/1479) | 62% (82/132) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (316/627) | 40% (53/131) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (150/298) | 57% (25/44) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (1032/2154) | 52% (141/272) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (20/10) | 60% (3/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (21/32) | 60% (3/5) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 0% (3/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (2/0) |
Sara Saito Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Sara Saito
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Sara Saito
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Sara Saito
Player
Alycia Parks
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sara Saito
Player
Francisca Jorge
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Arianne Hartono
Player
Sara Saito
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sara Saito
Player
Emina Bektas
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Saito
Player
Carol Zhao
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Sara Saito
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Sara Saito
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
90 of
132)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
49 of
90)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
61 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
123
Total Points Won
124
|
4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Saito
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Charo Esquiva Banuls Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Charo Esquiva Banuls
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Charo Esquiva Banuls
Player
Sarah Tatu
40%
(
25 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Charo Esquiva Banuls
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriela Lee
Player
Charo Esquiva Banuls
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Charo Esquiva Banuls
Player
Nadiya Kolb
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R3 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | |||
SF |
Jana Fett
Player
Charo Esquiva Banuls
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
9
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more